Thursday, May 21, 2009

new website

I have begun a networking website open to all plein air artists worldwide and totally free. In the past three weeks since our start, we have grown to 200 artists. So far we have no members from Mississippi. Please take a minute and look at the high level of work we are getting on our site. You can advertise events, workshops, shows and even keep your group as a separate entity. Please check us out and pass this along to your other members so they can all join in. And my appolgies for not contacting you sooner. I don't know what I was thinking.

pleinairartists.ning.com ... . ... please pass this along to your painting buddies.

90% must be completed on site.

Don Maier

pleinairartists.ning.com

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Health Care System

I just sent in a comment to Barack Obama's website about my experience with our health care system and thought I would like to share this with others....

I just turned 60 and have started collecting disability for a severe case of COPD, my reward for many years of smoking. I had been paying into various different HMO's over my 40 year working career, being without coverage a few times along the way. Fortunately, I have always enjoyed rather good health and seldom saw a doctor. In 2003 I went to my doctor with a shortness of breath and was first diagnosed with asthma, but later, after several other test, was told I had COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Soon, I also developed diabetes, probably from not getting enough exercise, however this is just my guess since my doctor was always in too much of a rush to talk to me about my condition. Once I went to him with a list of 9 ailments that I wanted to have him look at. He said, "I don't have time for all of those, pick the most important three". Obviously, I am not qualified to know which ones would be more important than others, but this gives a good example of the kind of treatment, or lack of treatment I was used to getting.
In Dec of 2005 I lost my teaching job and was unable to find a new job that would allow me to work in my diminished capacity. I then began paying out of pocket for my medical visits and about $500 per month for my prescriptions. In November of 2007, I contacted the Veteran's Administration, being a Viet Nam vet, and was expecting a long wait to be seen and cared for. To my surprise, they contacted me right away and gave me an appointment for my initial visit within one month. My new VA doctor gave me all new prescriptions, switching me from the expensive designer drugs, to generics in most cases, and set me up with lung function tests which also put me on oxygen therapy. In addition they advised me on how to apply for disability insurance, which I have been collecting for several months now. 
I only wish I had begun using my VA benefits when I was a young man and had not wasted so much money on health care payments to various HMO's that are so wasteful of our money and don't give the kind of care we need because they are based on making a profit and not helping the patient. What a monumental wast of money for so many years, and what's more, the care is so much better at the VA. The doctors all treat me with a great deal of respect, as do the attendants and nurses. They do not seem to be in a hurry to get rid of you and will explain things in detail in terms that I can understand. They ask me if I have any questions and patiently answer all my concerns.
My feeling is that is our national healthcare system were to be set up to mirror the VA system, we could have everyone covered and save money in the long run. So much time and effort is wasted in the insurance aspect of health care. If this alone could be eliminated, that would be a great savings. Also, if doctor were not marketed to by the drug companies to prescribe designer drugs to us and opt for the generic alternatives, we could realize a big savings there as well. 
In Short, if the profit motive was eliminated from the equation, then this whole healthcare picture would be different. Yes, what I am suggesting would throw a lot of people out of work, like drug salesman and insurance workers and paper pushers, but this is where the high cost of health care comes from in the first place.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Style vs Rules of Engagement

People will often complement me on my"style", or sometimes, if that person is also an artist, they might say that they like my "approach" to painting. Many people will say to me, whether they like my work or not, that they can always tell my paintings apart from other artists, having a distinct style.  A distinct style is something I think every artist strives for and I love hearing comments like this. A big part of what I do is to abstract shapes into a visual shorthand, but that is the topic for another blog entry.
In thinking about this style question, I began thinking about the reasons for a distinct style. Is style a function of the artist's ability, talent and training? If a person can always tell your work from others, does that mean you have a style that is unique to you, or perhaps your in a rut and afraid to venture out and try new things. After all, I turned 60 a few months ago, and I would rather not use an old retread like "old dog learning new tricks". I don't by that on anyway, Two years ago I was not using the Internet, however in the past two years I have become quiet adept at using it. I can actually say that it has changed my life... but that is yet another story for another time and blog entry... so I will not digress any longer.
I consider myself a purist, at least as an artist. For instance, in watercolor I do not use opaque white or pencil and will seldom scratch the paper or blot it to remove color. White is always pure virgin paper. These are rules I set for myself. As a teacher for ten years at Bauder College in Atlanta, I remember telling my  first year Color and Design students that in art there are no "rules".... but we do have "guidelines". . . principles that make-up the foundation of visual design. I taught from a text book and have often pondered this statement. These guidelines are basic principles that will help everyone become better artists, however rules that we set for ourselves, will regulate the outcome or appearance of our work, or our "style". Of course there are other factors at work here such as the subject matter, media and attack of the brush to canvas or pencil to paper. But as I thought about my work and how my style evolved, I began to realize it was largely due to many of the rules I set down for myself to follow... and they can be change at anytime! I call them "Rules of Engagement"... and the term came from the word "attack" when describing a hurried brush stroke used when painting on location and the piece needed to be done very quickly before the sun changed too much. So painting plein air, on location, is a factor (rule) that changes the look of your work. Early on I realized this and used the same hurried approach when painting from photographs. Previously, I could always tell a plein air painting from one done from a photo, but after I began using the same approach as I used on location, they were indistinguishable. 
Some other rules of engagement I use regularly are never to use graphite pencil to draw on my watercolor paper, instead using large brushes to block in areas of color isolating the white paper, which more often than not will become my focal point, something I learned from Andrew Wyeth's work. One way of creating a focal point is high contrast, and there is no greater contrast than black on white, so I often look for white objects to paint. Another way to affect the look of your work that is very effective is to limit your pallet. Try using only 8 colors, or 4 colors, or even two colors, such as the complementary colors of blue and orange, or red and green. The whole range of neutral shades that can be derived from these combinations is wonderful... something I learned from Remington's illustrations.
Yet another example of my rules of engagement comes from a life drawing session while teaching that dealt with contour vs gesture drawings. These two extremes of drawing, contour drawing being very slow, deliberate drawing of the outline edge of the subject done over a 20 minute sitting, vs the gesture drawing, which is a quick hurried sketch of the figure to show movement, done in 20 seconds. This is a perfect example of how the rules you set for your work will determine the final appearance. Try drawing the talking heads on TV. You will only have a few seconds or minutes to study the face and put it on paper. I recommend CSPAN, since they stay on the speaker for a longer time generally. Here is another one I tried out recently... I did a series of quick thumbnail sketches while at a red traffic light. I limited my drawing surface to the backs of business cards (2x3,5") and using a pen, so there is no erasing and going back to "do over". The drawing was finished when the light turned green or when the guy behind you honked his horn. This defiantly heightens the urgency of the on location experience... Maybe to push it to an extreme, I could do this while sky diving from an airplane. Oh, forget it... I am scared of heights! Back to the drawing board.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Asian Art Show


If you are in the Atlanta area, be sure to stop by the Fayette Art Center to check out the Asian Art Show. There are 6 artists represented in this show, one of them being my wife Suzie who is from Malaysia. Reception will be on Saturday Feb 2nd from 6:30pm to 8:30pm. Please come by and introduce yourself to us.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Original Art vs Digital Imaging

I have been seeing more and more people who have taken a photograph, put it through "artistic filters" in PhotoShop, and call it original art. I taught PhotoShop and can easily spot the effects. Some will print giclee prints and call those paintings too.  I feel that this is crossing the line and is dishonest and is mis-representing the work as something it is not.

Observation is probably the most important factor in art. When we look at a subject, we can adjust our vision to see certain things... whether it be value, color or texture... or whatever. A similar thing happens when we are looking for our keys in a box of junk... you have a certain shape or object in your head and when you spot that shape, a light goes off in your brain. I think that PhotoShop is a wonderful tool and I love using it. In fact, it can be a useful tool to show us how to see more abstractly, or how we can artificially saturate or de-saturate the colors and many other ways of changing an image and can be a real revelation in itself. It is a very cool thing. But to copy the image and call it original art is wrong, and I wish we could get this kind of image generation segregated into it's own category and away from original art. It is photography and digital imaging. 

As a plein air painter, one who paints on location, I used to get upset when I saw paintings that were obviously traced from photos or projected on a canvas, something that is very easy to recognize which I have come to accept as another artistic method... but this is worse... this is letting technology replace the creative element in painting. It is what it is, but don't call it ORIGIANL ART! At some point the word "Cheating" needs to be injected into the discussion.

ओरिजनल आर्ट